It happily works as a normal markdown editor on external files as well as those in its database, though with slightly fewer features (I think its file explorer gives it an advantage over WriteMonkey 3 in this regard). For those that want them, the Scrivener like scene/chapter/book type options seem functional. It's very simple all the options it has are useful to me (most writers, I imagine) and there's nothing else getting in the way. Despite the lack of folding, I can imagine using it as my main writing interface. There's also a note/sticky note feature (only one per sheet) and session word counts (and goals). These 'sheets' can also be split or merged as desired. Possibly the most important of these is that the files in a Library folder can be moved around the sequence easily and that individual files can be selected for export using the usual Ctrl or Shift options, which makes it very easy to put together a long document/book for export to Word or PDF. Imported files stay where they are, there's just a new copy created in the library the new copy is not synchronised with the original file.) ( I assume that the library is some type of database. There are a few more features, for those files created in or imported to the Library. And all of that is for files living in the file explorer, being shared with other editors. So no need to create documents if that's not needed, which suits my Workflowy purposes ideally - though I still need to do my copying from Word itself to get the paragraphs I need - Enter appears to = New Paragraph with Shift-Enter = New Line, but the 'paragraphs' are really markdown lines, and the new lines are soft line breaks.Īutosave is quite fast (at least in external files) and it has a regular backup schedule. It presents the option of exporting into a number of styles (Modern, Elegant, Formal etc), allows a preview, and then the options are to save, to put into clipboard or to open in a selected program - such as Word. There's a very nice set of export options - Ghost, Medium, WordPress (+ PDF & HTML) and especially. There's a comment syntax (++ for a line/section %% for blocks) There are statistics for selection and whole document (characters, sentences, paragraphs, pages - though I'm not sure how the pages are calculated). There's an option for live spellchecking in up to three languages (not that this is something I often turn on). There are four predefined tags - Urgent, ToDo, Draft and Published - which points to writers being their target market. It looks nice and easy on the eye (though would benefit from a focus mode - FocusWriter would be a good implementation maybe adding a sentence option). It has the necessary features ( bar underline and folding) but isn't weighed down by the tonnes of useless garbage most markdown editors smother themselves with. Well, it actually looks like a neat little editor for writers. So why would anyone consider paying money for it? Looking at the above, it looks much more limited than all the free editors I, and most people, use. I suppose the light theme is okay, but don't use them so can't compare. But does have images, tables etc working simply enough.The markdown syntax it has available is very limited.Slower than any markdown editor or word processor I have used before. There's no way to have more than one file open at a time that I could find - only one window, no tabs, only one pane.There's no folding on headings (and it accepts a #heading instead of requiring # heading).There's no ability to move files around, or headers around in the outline.I didn't try HTML, but the docx imports never worked. It has typewriter mode, but no focus mode apart from making the edit pane full screen.This one is remarkably similar in tone to my preferred theme on Obsidian (Obsidian Nord). I like the dark theme (which is what I use) much better than the iA Writer theme which always felt to starkly black and contrasty. It feels as if there's a macness about it. Many similarities to iA Writer and Ulysses to my untutored eye as a non-Mac user who tried the iA Writer trial, but never felt any value in using it. Though not minimalist in cost - it's not expensive but it is paid software whereas most markdown editors on Windows are free. Minimalist in looks, minimalist in features and virtually no settings that can be tweaked. It's a minimalist wysiwygish markdown editor.Īnd I really mean minimalist. (I suppose another way of thinking about it, is 'how did I hear about it now?' and I'm not sure I can answer that either. Why have I never heard of Inspire Writer?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |